Hung Fermentations, Water Analysis Tables, and Eggs in Beer
Q and A with David Miller (Brewing Techniques)
The BrewingTechniques troubleshooter helps one brewer solve a case of fermentations that just didn’t want to get going, answers another perplexed brewer’s questions about his local utility’s water analysis tables, and speculates on the origin and purpose of a strange brewing practice from the 19th century Midwest.
The Slow-Start, Hung-Fermentation Blues
Sanitation has been my religion through life, and in the brewery I’m a saint. My water is R.O., tested, and mineral-free and adjusted as per recipe. The only variance so far has been in the malt extract
used (I have not yet advanced to grain). The extract has ranged from one to two 4-lb cans of Alexander Liquid Extract to John Bull’s (same quantities) to Steinbart’s (one 7-lb can).
My problem is that I can’t get fermentation started. I have tried warmer temperatures (72–74 °F) for two days, and I tried using a teaspoon of amylose and one of super nutrient
. It still won’t start. A few brews progressed weakly to finish and then failed to carbonate.
I have used two packets of yeast starter with wort
(1.040–1.050 specific gravity) that was prepared in advance and placed in a Mason jar — all following your book’s directions. I have used Wyeast 12-g packets. I have also used Brewer’s Choice liquid foil pack culture (all as starters). I have used Edme. I prime with 3/4 cup of corn sugar
When the specific gravity has dropped to the same value for two consecutive days with no change (usually in the 1.017–1.020 range), I rack off and rest five days before bottling. Wort specific gravities range from 1.040 to 1.046.
I guard against oxidation after fermentation and don’t aerate hot wort. I do aerate before yeast and after chilling the wort.
David Miller: You have a classic case of “hanging fermentation.” Judging by the number of different yeasts you have used, it seems that a bad yeast culture is not the cause of your problem. I don’t believe your variations in the recipe have anything to do with it, either. There are two prime suspects in this case.
The first is insufficient aeration of the chilled wort. The method I have described elsewhere — fanning the wort down the side of the fermentor as you siphon — is not really enough unless you have a very large, vigorous yeast starter. I suggest either agitating the pitched wort by shaking the fermentor vigorously for at least 30 min, or buying or making an aerator and using it. Aerate the pitched wort until foam reaches the top of the fermentor. Then, let the foam subside for a few hours and repeat. A few hours later, repeat again. The idea is to bubble air through the wort for at least 15 min during the first 6–8 h after cooling and pitching.
It is hard to overestimate the importance of thorough aeration for yeast growth. At our brewery, I use a stainless steel rig, and our worts start to ferment in 3–8 h.
I suggest you work on wort aeration first. I assume from your letter that your yeast starter cultures are well aerated and fermenting strongly when you pitch them. If that is the case, then aerating the wort should give the growth you need for a strong fermentation. If not, then consider the second possibility.
You mentioned in your letter that your brewing water is “R.O., tested, and mineral free,” by which I infer that you use a reverse-osmosis filter to remove all minerals from the water. This might be a mistake. Yeast requires trace amounts of many different minerals to grow and flourish. A very large brewery had fermentation problems that were traced to a copper deficiency in the wort. Zinc deficiencies can cause the same trouble, and so can the lack of other minerals. These problems cannot be corrected by adding regular brewers’ salts (gypsum
, Epsom salts
, and so forth) to the wort, because the salts do not contain the right minerals.
Unless your water supply has iron in it, you probably don’t need to demineralize it for brewing purposes. I suggest boiling your brewing water as an alternative to reverse-osmosis filtration. This will remove chlorine and excess alkalinity but leave the trace minerals.
Two other suggestions come to mind from reading your recipes. First, I don’t believe there is any need to add gypsum or other brewers’ salts to an extract wort. The main purpose of these salts is to correct the pH of the mash. The malt extract manufacturer has taken care of that part of the process for you.
The other suggestion is that you not let your wort sit around all night before pitching the yeast. Pitch the yeast and aerate the wort immediately after chilling to fermentation temperature. Aerate several times as described above. Next morning, your wort should be starting to ferment. Now is the time to rack it off the trub (break material) into the primary fermentor.
The reason behind pitching your wort as soon as it is chilled is that in a home brewing situation the wort is always going to be exposed to a certain amount of contamination when it is transferred from one vessel to another. It’s just not possible for most home brewers to set up a totally enclosed, sanitary system. When I took a course in brewing microbiology at the Siebel Institute, the things I learned scared the heck out of me. Germs are everywhere, and in the absence of a competing organism (brewer’s yeast), they can multiply like crazy in wort.
Another reason for pitching immediately after cooling is that a certain amount of trub actually can be beneficial in the early stages of fermentation. Trub contains sterols that can assist yeast growth. Of course, once the yeast has gone into fermentation mode, it’s a good idea to separate the wort from as much trub as possible.
These are some things to work on. Good luck with your brewing, and please let me know how it works out.
Q: I am sure both your solutions are the answers to my failures, and I now have a batch “in the oven,” with yeast pitched immediately after chilling. I gave it some aeration (as best I could) and had bubbling in the airlock immediately — what a welcome sign.
On Tuesday I went to our local Durney’s Pet Place and bought all of the necessary pieces outlined in your sketch. With very, very little modification, I sit here writing to you with the aerator fully assembled and tested, ready for sanitization and the next batch.
Some time before reading your first book we thought it best to go R.O with our water because of very high iron and other mineral content. We live in the country, however, and have no chlorine problem. As a result, I thought I was on the right track in my treatment of the water. As an experiment, my next batch will have no water treatment.
DM: Regarding your plan to try using straight water in your next batch, I have one piece of advice: Don’t! If you have well water that contains iron, your beer will have the same metallic taste your tap water does. I am afraid my previous letter may have led you to the wrong conclusion. The reason I suggested trying a wort aerator first is that most of the time it will cure the slow-start, hung-fermentation blues. If aeration works, there is no reason to change your water treatment. Try the easy cure first before you take on a much more problematic one.
But suppose the worst happens and you’re still having fermentation trouble, even though you built an aerator and are using it faithfully. Then you have to look at your water. If you know your water contains iron, however, you will have to continue using your reverse-osmosis filter or some other method to demineralize it. What to do?
According to some of the people at the other, slightly larger brewery here in St. Louis, the two most common mineral deficiencies in wort are copper and zinc. If you use a wort chiller made from copper tubing, you will get plenty of copper in your wort. If you went the deluxe route and built a wort chiller out of stainless steel, you can cure a copper deficiency by putting a few pennies in the bottom of your kettle during the boil.
Zinc could be added the same way, if you can find some small strips of the metal somewhere. Otherwise, you can try to get ahold of zinc sulfate at a pharmacy. Another avenue to explore would be using a yeast energizer. Some of these products contain zinc and other minerals, vitamins, and amino acids. You would have to question your supplier closely to find out exactly what the product contains.
As a last resort, you might want to call The Beverage People of Santa Rosa. They sell a yeast energizer made for mead. Mead is a notoriously difficult drink to make, primarily because honey is so low in nutrients. If The Beverage People’s energizer works for mead, it sure ought to cure any problem you could be having with lack of nutrients in a beer wort.
Demystifying Water Analysis Tables
Q: I sent for a copy of the water analysis from my local water company, and now that I’ve got it, I can’t make heads or tails of it. Please help!
DM: The problem here is that your water analysis is very comprehensive — too comprehensive, in fact, for a brewer’s purposes. Assuming that the water is not contaminated with pesticides or other manmade pollutants, you need only look at about 8 or 10 lines on the sheet: alkalinity (also called total alkalinity), calcium, chloride, iron, magnesium, pH, sodium, sulfate, and total dissolved solids. These are the parameters that will affect the brewing reactions and the flavor of the finished beer.
Looking at the water analysis sheet you sent me, I notice that the numbers vary somewhat from one date to another. This is normal and need not concern you, because the variation is not great. The figures in the “Average” column are all you need to concern yourself with.
I can also see that you have very soft water; that is, you water has a low mineral content and low alkalinity. I dislike the terms hard and soft because they are not precise and because all hard waters cannot be treated the same. You have to know exactly what makes them hard.
Soft water such as yours, however, is defined by an absence of minerals, and the treatment required is pretty simple. For pale lagers and ales, raise the calcium content into the range of 50–100 parts per million by adding a calcium salt — either calcium chloride, which will give the flavor a soft, sweet edge, or calcium sulfate, which gives a dry edge that accentuates hop bitterness. Most brewers prefer chloride for lagers and German and American ales, and sulfate for British-style pale ales.
These salts are available in several forms, with or without water or hydration, so if you want to get precise you need to know the exact chemical composition of your calcium additive, then get out your periodic table and do some computations. Then you have to get ahold of a good lab scale and weigh out the addition. If you don’t want to get that picky about it, though, you can just start with 1 tsp/5 gal. of mash water. After mashing in, check your pH to see if it’s in the proper range (5.0–5.7). Chances are it will be.
For dark beers, add calcium carbonate to the mash (not the water, because it won’t dissolve). It will raise the pH into the proper range (5.0–5.7). Follow the same method as above. You will probably find that 1 tsp is enough, but you may need 2 tsp/5 gal. In my experience, 2 tsp is the most you will need.
Your water should be fine for sparging as is. It is always a good idea, however, to check the pH of your last runnings at the end of the sparge. If their pH is >5.7, you can treat your sparge water with a small amount of phosphoric acid or lactic acid to lower its pH to 5.7. But I doubt this will prove necessary with your water supply.
Finally, I need to say that this water treatment recommendation is for grain brewing using the infusion mash method. If you are using malt extract, you shouldn’t need to add any treatment salts to your wort. If you are using decoction mashing, you will find that the mashing process lowers the pH of the mash significantly, and you will probably not need to add calcium chloride or calcium sulfate for making pale beers. For dark beers, you will certainly need to use calcium carbonate.
Your water supply is excellent for a brewer’s purposes — the practical equivalent of a painter’s blank canvas. I congratulate and envy you.
Here's Egg in Your Beer
Q: I have written a history of a pre-Prohibition brewery that part of my family owned: The Halm Brewery of Bryan, Ohio (1865–1907). It was founded by a great-grandfather, Jacob Halm, who immigrated from the Stuttgart area in 1854. The family had been brewers and vintners for generations before him in their little Neckar valley village. They included a practice in their brewing which I have found odd, and I would like to know if you have ever heard of it or if it makes scientific sense to you.
During the course of my research I interviewed two elderly gentlemen during the mid-1970s who, as young boys (teenagers), worked in the brewery. One, Art Halm, was the grandson of the founder and son of the owner (circa 1900). The other was the son of the brewmaster. They both told me that they were prohibited from the more dangerous parts of the brewery, including the engine room and around the barley washers where exposed drive shafts and so forth were a hazard. They were allowed on the first floor, which contained the laboratory, open oak primary fermentors, and the brew kettle. They had one job in the brewery: Together, they operated a gadget over the brew kettle which separated 90 dozen egg whites from the yolks and dropped the whites into the brew! The yolks were discarded with the spent grains, which were sold as cattle feed additive.
When I heard this from Art Halm and his fellow “egger,” Ray Wheeler, in 1977, I knew too little to appreciate how odd a practice this was or I would have pursued it further. They are both dead now. I did have enough presence of mind to ask Art why this was done, and his answer was that the egg whites acted as a clarifier to settle solids out of the brew and that if there was any residual protein from the whites, he figured that they may have added to the heading quality of the beer. This story was confirmed in two separate interviews with Halm and Wheeler, who had not seen each other in decades.
The question I have is this: If egg whites were added to the hot brew kettle, wouldn’t they immediately cook, turn solid and drop? Herb Haydock, the collector, asked me about this and was quite curious. The story has spawned other inquiries about it from brewery historians, brew school academics, and even All About Beer. I simply don’t have an answer. It is possible that the two men were confused about where they had added the egg whites — perhaps not at the brew kettle but at the Kühlschiff (pitching tanks or primary fermentors), but the brew kettle was where they said they dropped them.
I would like to know if you are aware of any such brewing practice or if this makes brewing-chemistry sense to you. It would help me greatly and satisfy the curiosity of others. Plus, I might even add it (properly) to my next batch of lager. I calculate the equivalent as 0.54 of an egg white per 5-gal. batch. I think I can measure that!
DM: Thanks for your fascinating letter. Let me start right off by saying that I have never seen “egging” mentioned in the brewing literature. It seems likely that this was one of those family secrets that may have been passed down through generations of brewmasters.
There are certainly analogous practices in cooking. Whole eggs or egg whites are sometimes used to clarify bullion stock and coffee made in old-fashioned pots. The chemical basis of the practice is that albumin (egg white) will denature in hot liquid and form large flakes. These flakes may (though I’m not sure) form a weak electrical bond with the much finer particulate matter in the broth or coffee and carry it to the bottom. Or perhaps they simply lie on top of the fine particles and prevent them from redispersing when the liquid is decanted.
Elsewhere I have explained the chemical reaction of trub formation. In my practical experience, I have found that when I add more tannin to a high-protein (wheat beer) wort in the form of hops, the wort becomes clearer. It is possible, I suppose, that if one had a wort with a large surplus of tannins, that adding more protein in the form of egg whites might likewise produce a clearer wort. But where all that tannin would come from I cannot say. Maybe from the grain husks, if the brewer was using an especially poor variety of six-row barley. If that were the source, then “egging” would serve not only to clarify the wort but also to reduce the grainy astringency associated with such malts. In fact, the primary goal of the practice may have been to smooth the flavor of the finished beer rather than to clarify the wort.
Well, there’s some speculation for you, which may be as far as we can go. Art Halm and Ray Wheeler probably did not know why they added eggs to the kettle, and their fathers may not have known, either. In a practical craft like brewing, experiments rapidly become traditions and until recently were seldom tested rigorously. Sometime in the past, some guy tried egging the wort and thought it helped somehow, so he kept doing it.
All contents copyright 2019 by MoreFlavor Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this document or the related files may be reproduced or transmitted in any form, by any means (electronic, photocopying, recording, or otherwise) without the prior written permission of the publisher.